User talk:Drkyt

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Drkyt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Sir, as I have been asked to request you to unblock, I assure you that I will create the articles only through ask to be created and as you find that a few of my articles are notable sometimes we feel this is notable locally and wikipedia would like to be created, but in future I will see the universe ability and only then I will create. Drkyt (talk) 13:23, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I agree that you do not have the written English skills required for contributing effectively to the English Wikipedia. May I suggest the Hindi Wikipedia? MER-C 09:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Drykt, notability is only one of the issues with what you've been doing. In many cases, you've been using a highly promotional tone. Just from a single article of yours, that was deleted for blatantly promotional tone: ("...Shri Manish Gupta Sh. Deepak Gupta are carry forwarding his vision...", "...impart quality education..."). That has been a significant problem with many of your edits. Both tone and content on Wikipedia must be neutral, and must seek neither to promote or denigrate anyone or anything. They also should not use peacock adjectives, just neutrally describe. Additionally, several of your edits have been copyright violations. You cannot simply copy and paste text into Wikipedia from other sources, except for short and properly attributed and used quotes or excerpts. You'll need to address these issues as well. Also, could you please tell me how you would determine whether a subject is a suitable one to write an article about? Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 16:02, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

User talk:SeraphimbladeSir, as you found that there were no references directly attached to the same. So I assure you even a single line or phrase will be used only with references. I will find the notability with the references. My main interest is to create the pages related to villages and pages of retired professors (those who have contributed a lot in field of literature, research and remained on notable key positions as jurist, historian etc.). I am thankful for considering my request to unblock.Drkyt (talk) 02:13, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm concerned by your comment that "I assure you even a single line or phrase will be used only with references", as it suggests you think that adding a reference allows you to copy other people's text into Wikipedia? It does not, and you must not copy material from elsewhere into Wikipedia articles (with some small exceptions such as for use as a direct quote). Material you add to Wikipedia articles must be written in your own words. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:50, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

User talk:Boing! said Zebedee i agree not to use copied material and I will write in my own language.Drkyt (talk) 10:12, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Also of concern is the use of 'we': suggesting shared use. Perhaps (if appeal it's successful) mentoring might be of help in the future? _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:44, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm also a bit concerned about the level of English competency shown, especially in the excerpts given above. —Jeremy v^_^v ^Bori! 06:12, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

I assert that I will adhere with the rules and I will do my edits sparingly. English is a second language for me, so it is to be taken secondary.Drkyt (talk) 16:44, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

As I have requested earlier that I will do anything sparingly. Please consider my request to unblock.Drkyt (talk) 02:37, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't really see any indication that you've actually understood what's wrong or that these things will improve. However, you have your unblock request up, so another admin will be able to consider what you've said as well. If they think it's enough, I've no objection to any decision they may make. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 02:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article M. S. Maan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/M. S. Maan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Derek Andrews (talk) 09:28, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pre-Classical School (Criminology) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pre-Classical School (Criminology) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 23:39, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Template:Vice-Chancellors of India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 05:31, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

Template:Travel companies in India has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:35, 7 July 2017 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on P. P. Singh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Venkat TL (talk) 10:22, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on A. S. Dalal requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Venkat TL (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article A. S. Dalal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/A. S. Dalal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Venkat TL (talk) 05:29, 30 September 2021 (UTC)