User talk:Andreas Rejbrand

Please post any messages on my Swedish talk page, as I do not visit the English Wikipedia every day. You are, however, free to write in English.

A tag has been placed on Oh, be a fine girl and kiss me, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 14:17, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Oh, Be A Fine Girl, Kiss Me, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 14:19, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Oh, Be A Fine Girl, Kiss Me, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 14:54, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

What??

I am administrator at Swedish Wikipedia, and administrator and bureaucrat at Swedish Wiktionary. The term "Oh, be a fine girl, kiss me" is a widely-known phrase for remembering the stellar spectral classes (O, B, A, F, G, K, M). Almost all physicists know it, and it is mentioned in most introductory astrophysics books. Furthermore, it is mentioned in the Stellar classification article, the target of the redirects. You really should be more careful before classifying articles (including redirects) as "nonsense". --Andreas Rejbrand (talk) 14:55, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Sorry, the article as it existed when I tagged it mentioned none of this. What I saw was nothing but an invitation to discuss, which, as you probably know, should not be in the article mainspace. Maybe previous versions are a different story, I don't know. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 14:59, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Your apology is accepted! Of course, I put the text on the article instead of its talk page. --Andreas Rejbrand (talk) 15:01, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

I am administrator at Swedish Wikipedia, and administrator and bureaucrat at Swedish Wiktionary. The term "Oh, be a fine girl, kiss me" is a widely-known phrase for remembering the stellar spectral classes (O, B, A, F, G, K, M). Almost all physicists know it, and it is mentioned in most introductory astrophysics books. Furthermore, it is mentioned in the Stellar classification article, the target of the redirects. You really should be more careful before classifying articles (including redirects) as "nonsense". --Andreas Rejbrand (talk) 14:51, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

• I actually checked the article for that line, but my Firefox search told me that it did not exist. I tried it again a minute ago, and again it did not come up. Why? Because my search was set to be case sensitive, which caused "oh," to return nothing. Sorry for the trouble, but know i actually tried to check it :) Excirial ^{(Talk,Contribs)} 15:02, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Your apology is accepted! :) --Andreas Rejbrand (talk) 15:02, 24 February 2008 (UTC)

Regarding this response:

Stating an opinion is "neutral" is not acceptable according to Wikipedia policy. We're pretty loose at the Reference Desk (and my comment was intended to derail a holy war as much as chastise you) but you cannot seriously hold that your biased personal opinions are "neutral". Please review the Reference Desk guidelines and try to refrain from providing biased personal opinions to future queries. Thank you. – 74  01:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

"Blue colour is more appealing than red colour" is (according to one of two possible definitions of the word) an opinion, which in general is neither true nor false and is related to an emotional response. "I think that blue colour is more appealing than red colour" is a fact (either true or false - maybe you even can verify it using some medical imaging technique applied to the brain). "Neutral" was maybe ("maybe" because some great NPOV articles cite the opinions of other people) a bad word - I'm sorry for that - but the latter example certainly qaulifies as a "fact". But really, it is no big deal. I could spend some hours investigating the definitions of "opinion", "neutral", "fact", "POV" and their use (and misuse) in the current discussion, but I am short of time. Your comment regarding IE was not obviously neutral, either. Also, the user seemed to be looking for "opinions" as well as "facts". My point is that I do not find this issue important enough to investigate it further. One simple thing to think about, however, is that you should not post comments that are not necessary. --Andreas Rejbrand (talk) 13:59, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Suit yourself; but willful ignorance of the rules is not a defense. – 74  23:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

I am not familiar with the expression "suit yourself". However, I notice some annoyance in your "voice", and it might simply be due to a misunderstanding. When I wrote "One simple thing to think about, however, is that you should not post comments that are not necessary.", I was of course referring to this comment (and, to some extent, the previous comment made by you). But I really do not see why we should make any big deal out of this. My original post (Chrome) was not that awful. Then you came with a not really neccesary comment, and then I wrote an even more irrelevant comment. I am sorry for that! --Andreas Rejbrand (talk) 23:41, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

"Suit yourself" is an idiom meaning "do as you please". As I previously stated, my comment was a half-joke intended to prevent the question from turning into an opinion survey (which a previous poster had correctly identified as prohibited by our guidelines), a "humorous reminder" of neutrality. Was my comment necessary? I have no idea. I'm sorry if you took it as a personal attack; I assure you that wasn't what I intended. – 74  02:41, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

		The Reference Desk Barnstar
		Thank you for helping me fix my screen resolution. I am forever in your debt. Dendodge TalkContribs 21:45, 20 March 2009 (UTC)

Your malware problem did not come from ED. Your description also sounds like you browse the web in an insecure environment. I will be restoring the links to the ED page. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

My environment is very secure. And I have never seen anything like it before. But do as you want. I am not an expert, but I would not visit that site again on my main computer. --Andreas Rejbrand (talk) 03:01, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

The article is about ED, and it would constitute original research to say that a malware problem originated from the site.--♦IanMacM♦ ^{(talk to me)} 07:17, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Well, if it turned out to be a dangerous site, in the sense that visiting it is likely to harm the computer, then I do not think it is appropriate for Wikipedia to link to it. We should not treat our reads like that. But, perhaps the site is completely harmless. I do not know; that was why I asked on WP:RD/C. --Andreas Rejbrand (talk) 13:21, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Hello, Andreas Rejbrand. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Reference desk/Computing.
Message added 20:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I will also copy this to your Swedish wikipedia talk page. Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 20:09, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for trying to help. I wanted you to know I solved that problem and one other problem that came up as I was attempting to describe the details of what happened.

Details here.

Thank you for raising the question and thank you for your continued involvement in the ensuing conversation involving quite a number of people. I felt it was a good conversation. You helped to guide us to an area of research, albeit "original," on a topic I don't recall seeing before. I hope "alienation" was a relevant concept to bring to the discussion. I just meant it in the sense that television broadcasters are understandably interested in keeping the greatest number viewers (potential buyers of products) watching their TV program. Bus stop (talk) 15:43, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello, Andreas Rejbrand. You have new messages at File talk:Arch-computer.jpg.
Message added -- Trevj (talk) 16:02, 23 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Andreas Rejbrand. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Andreas Rejbrand. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Hello, Andreas Rejbrand. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Andreas Rejbrand. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)