User talk:191.9.57.3

In today's world, User talk:191.9.57.3 is a very relevant topic and of great interest to society. With the advancement of technology and globalization, User talk:191.9.57.3 has become a topic of discussion in different areas, from politics to science. In this article, we will explore different aspects about User talk:191.9.57.3 and its impact on today's society. We will analyze its implications, its evolution over time and the possible solutions to the challenges it poses. User talk:191.9.57.3 is not only a matter of public interest, but also has direct consequences on people's lives. Therefore, it is essential to understand its importance and its influence on our daily lives.

January 2025

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 14:43, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

191.9.57.3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What vandalism? I was just removing the American ban because Trump repealed it. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/2025/01/initial-rescissions-of-harmful-executive-orders-and-actions/ I explained it once in a summary. 191.9.57.3 (talk) 14:54, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

If you want to promote any president's policies(or lack thereof), go get a job at the White House. If you want to collaborate with other editors to achieve a consensus, please tell how you will do that that does not involve edit warring. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 18:28, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

191.9.57.3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I'm blocked for, I'll avoid doing it again, and I'll make productive contributions and bring the conflicts to the respective talk pages to achive consensus instead. 191.9.57.3 (talk) 18:47, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Personally, I would have just declined this request out of hand the moment I saw it as a transparent attempt to just say the magic words to get unblocked without really addressing your actual behavior.

However, I've held off from doing so as other admins were discussing options with you. I'm not seeing a solid agreement between all parties, so it seems like the reasonable course of action is to let the block run its course, with a strong caution to you to avoid further disruptive editing, in particular in the area of contemporary American politics, broadly construed. Beeblebrox Beebletalks 00:45, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi there, and thank you for your unblock request! In your request, you wrote, "the block is no longer necessary because I understand what I'm blocked for". Can you explain why you were blocked? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:20, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

@Significa liberdade: I warred rather than bring the conflict to the talk page. 191.9.57.3 (talk) 19:24, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
@UtherSRG: in light of the user's comments immediately above, how do you feel about converting the block to a partial block on Phase-out of fossil fuel vehicles, but allowing other pages including the talk page? PhilKnight (talk) 16:38, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
How about all USA politics? - UtherSRG (talk) 16:46, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Yeah, sounds good. 191.9.57.3 what do you think about a topic ban of all USA politics instead of a block? PhilKnight (talk) 16:49, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
@PhilKnight: Just a (temporary) block for the fossil fuel vehicle ban article. I like to edit the page about Trump's appointments. 191.9.57.3 (talk) 18:13, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Topics related to modern US politics are designated as contentious on Wikipedia with an even greater focus on consensus-building using the Talk page. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 06:57, 25 January 2025 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Beeblebrox Beebletalks 00:49, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

January 2025

Stop icon with clock
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for block evasion.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  UtherSRG (talk) 12:33, 29 January 2025 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

191.9.57.3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The original block expired five hours before the first edit with the new IP. 177.76.240.32 (talk) 13:20, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Unblock request was not made by this IP address. Yamla (talk) 13:25, 29 January 2025 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia