Template talk:Nearest star systems
Today, Template talk:Nearest star systems is a topic that generates great interest and debate in society. Since its emergence, it has caused an impact in various areas of daily life, from politics to entertainment. The evolution of Template talk:Nearest star systems has been the subject of study and analysis by experts in different fields, who seek to understand its implications and consequences. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the importance and relevance of Template talk:Nearest star systems today, as well as its influence on popular culture and global decision-making.
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | This template was considered for deletion on 27 April 2011. The result of the discussion was "keep". |
Excised
|group2 = <small>Small<br/>bodies</small><sup>§</sup>
|list2 = {{Navbox subgroup
|groupstyle=width:5em;
|liststyle=width:auto;
|group1=]
|list1=<small>] (many)</small>
|group2=]
|list2=<small>]{{·}} ]{{·}} ]{{·}} ]{{·}} ]{{·}} Star 48B</small>
}}
|below=<small><sup>§</sup>Currently located within Solar System boundaries, but not gravitationally bound with it</small>
I excised the above because it is indiscriminate information that is better served in a separate listing. This is now clearly only stars. 76.66.195.196 (talk) 04:49, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Star Systems within 20–40 light-years?
This is what I've came up of:
2600:1700:6180:6290:9DF4:436E:5E7F:66B (talk) 14:30, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
- Please see Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2015_March_18#.22Nearby.22_star_navboxes for why we do not (and will not) have templates like this. Primefac (talk) 18:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)