In this article, we will thoroughly explore the phenomenon of Template talk:Demography of the United States and its implications in today's society. From its origin to its possible future consequences, we will analyze in detail each aspect related to Template talk:Demography of the United States, with the aim of providing a comprehensive and complete vision of this topic. Through collecting data, reviewing studies, and consulting experts, we aim to shed light on Template talk:Demography of the United States and offer an informed and enriching perspective for our readers. Read on to discover everything you need to know about Template talk:Demography of the United States and its relevance in the contemporary world.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Demography of the United States template. |
|
United States Template‑class | |||||||
|
I've made a template, Template:Demographics of US, to link together the Demographics of California article with Demographics of New York, etc. I don't know if these templates, both titled "Demographics of the United States" should be merged, or linked together somehow.--Patrick «» 02:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
I still don't see how it improves the template at all. There's no break really in the sense of the words so why should there be in the layout? Is this due to some standard layout rule I am not aware of? Munci (talk) 21:14, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
I tried to break this into sections, but it will need more work and maybe adding child navboxes to sort it out better. Funandtrvl (talk) 20:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Should a link to the article whose scope are Americans abroad, be included in this template?--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 02:00, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
The link to Asia does not link to the continent but to Asian Americans, @The Human Trumpet Solo:, why revert my edits which made it clear which ethnicities were considered Asian Americans and which are not. The reversion does not make sense to me, nor does it align with the way that the template Template:Asian Americans functions. We do not include non-Asian Americans in that template, if we are to include non-Asian Americans under an Asia heading which links directly to Asian Americans, IMHO there should be a clear delineation, so there isn't some confusion as to racial categorization in the United States.--RightCowLeftCoast (Moo) 01:58, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
I propose that reporting of this demographic is sexist. In order to get with the times I propose that simply listing “single homeowner” as a better demographic if it needs to be reported at all. Juliekagy (talk) 23:19, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
Ethiopian Americans, Somali Americans and Eritrean Americans are missing from the Africa section of the template. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:4460:41A0:7C60:C415:F2:51C8 (talk) 01:56, 15 November 2019 (UTC)