In the modern world,
Template:Did you know nominations/Hoi Tong Monastery assumes a fundamental role in our society! Whether through his impact on culture, art, politics or technology,
Template:Did you know nominations/Hoi Tong Monastery has left an indelible mark on human history. From ancient times to the digital age,
Template:Did you know nominations/Hoi Tong Monastery has been the object of study, admiration and controversy. In this article, we will explore the impact of
Template:Did you know nominations/Hoi Tong Monastery on different aspects of everyday life, analyzing its influence in the past, its relevance in the present and its possible repercussions in the future. We will begin by examining the historical meaning of
Template:Did you know nominations/Hoi Tong Monastery, and then delve into its importance today and project its possible evolution in the years to come. Get ready to discover an infinite universe of possibilities around
Template:Did you know nominations/Hoi Tong Monastery!
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 19:44, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Hoi Tong Monastery
Created by LlywelynII (talk). Self-nominated at 00:51, 3 July 2016 (UTC).
- This article is new enough and long enough. It is neutral and free from copyright issues as far as I can see. The image of the monastery is in the public domain and I like ALT0, but having found page 177 of the cited source, I see that the pigs were not "sacred", but were kept to show respect for animal life. I thought of "revered", "respected" or "venerated" for the hook, but none of these seems quite right. You may be able to think of something better. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:38, 16 July 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review and hope it was an interesting topic. That said, the first OED definition of "sacred" apart from the exclusively Christian senses is "dedicated, set apart, exclusively appropriated to some person or some special purpose" which fits these pigs just fine. Since that's true, I'm not going to emend it at all, but you're the reviewer—you're welcome to just nix the word (which might make it more compelling), review another hook, or (although this is probably impossible on the internet) realize you were mistaken in your initial impression. — LlywelynII 13:30, 17 July 2016 (UTC)
- OK then, I can see that the definition of "sacred" is a bit wider than I had thought, so this is ready to go with ALT0 and I will strike the other hooks. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:39, 17 July 2016 (UTC)