Template:Did you know nominations/Fédération des sociétés féminines sportives de France
In this article, we will explore the topic of Template:Did you know nominations/Fédération des sociétés féminines sportives de France and its impact on contemporary society. From its emergence to its current evolution, Template:Did you know nominations/Fédération des sociétés féminines sportives de France has played a crucial role in various aspects of daily life. Throughout this analysis, we will examine the different aspects that make up Template:Did you know nominations/Fédération des sociétés féminines sportives de France, as well as its influence on culture, economy, and technology. Furthermore, we will also address the ethical and social implications associated with Template:Did you know nominations/Fédération des sociétés féminines sportives de France, as well as possible future perspectives. With a multidisciplinary approach, this article seeks to offer a comprehensive view on Template:Did you know nominations/Fédération des sociétés féminines sportives de France and its importance in the modern world.
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Amakuru (talk) 11:27, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Fédération des sociétés féminines sportives de France
- ... that after being told that women could not compete in athletics at the 1924 Summer Olympics, the FSFSF setup their own Women's Olympiad? Source:
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/2013 Football League Two play-off Final
- Comment: Partial translation from French, but still eligible as per WP:DYKRULES rule 1e.
Would be good to run in March (Women's History Month)
Created by Joseph2302 (talk). Self-nominated at 21:38, 10 February 2021 (UTC).
. New enough, long enough, reads well, QPQ provided, no copyvio issues. Hook interesting, in article and followed by an in-line citation containing that fact. Nice images. Good to run in March. Whispyhistory (talk) 05:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
