In today's article we are going to talk about
Template:Did you know nominations/Cafe Royal Cocktail Book, a topic that has captured the attention of many people in recent times. It is important to understand the importance of
Template:Did you know nominations/Cafe Royal Cocktail Book in our lives and the impact it can have on our daily lives. Throughout this article we will explore different aspects related to
Template:Did you know nominations/Cafe Royal Cocktail Book, from its history to its current relevance. We will also analyze the opinions of experts on the subject and the different points of view that exist on the matter. We hope this article gives you a broader insight into
Template:Did you know nominations/Cafe Royal Cocktail Book and helps you understand its importance in today's world. Without further ado, let's begin to delve into the fascinating world of
Template:Did you know nominations/Cafe Royal Cocktail Book.
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Cafe Royal Cocktail Book
Created by Samtar (talk) and Ritchie333 (talk). Nominated by Samtar (talk) at 12:00, 24 November 2016 (UTC).
- I don't want to be a stick in the mud, but I don't believe either of the book sources say authoritatively that they were the first recorded recipes, merely early instances of them. In general, having a "first", "greatest", "largest", "smallest" hook at DYK runs a good chance of being challenged when it hits the queue or main page, and pulled. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
-
- You're right - I'll keep that in mind, thank you. I imagine using "first" needs a pretty authoritative and explicit source - ALT2 looks good to me -- samtar talk or stalk 13:00, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
- for ALT2. New enough: Article created by Samtar on November 23, 2016. Large enough: prose size (text only) is 1690 characters (279 words) "readable prose size" (measured by DYKCheck tool). Within policy: neutral, good inline citations, no copyvio detected. The hook is neutral, sourced, amd appropriate length. Gronk Oz (talk) 08:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)