Template:Did you know nominations/Body Offering (novel)

In today's world, Template:Did you know nominations/Body Offering (novel) is an issue that continues to gain relevance in society. Template:Did you know nominations/Body Offering (novel) has long captured the interest of people of all ages and cultural backgrounds. Whether for its impressive technological advances, its controversial political decisions or its innovative artistic proposals, Template:Did you know nominations/Body Offering (novel) never ceases to surprise and generate debate. Over the years, Template:Did you know nominations/Body Offering (novel) has been a recurring topic in the media and has sparked the interest of researchers and academics from various disciplines. In this article, we will explore different aspects of Template:Did you know nominations/Body Offering (novel), analyzing its influence today and the possible repercussions it could have in the future.
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Body Offering (novel)

(
)
  • ... that the 2013 novel Body Offering was described by a critic as "more erratic than erotic"? Source:

Created 5x expanded by DanCherek (talk). Self-nominated at 15:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC).

  • I'm not happy about "Created" eligibility given that it was previously a stub and then redirected, but I think it's not far from "5x". Per A4, we discount copyvios, so I'll take 580 characters as the pre-expansion size, and it's now at 2,718 characters. If you can take that to 2,900 then that's 5x. A sentence or two about who Paranjape is (and The Hindu could work for that) should take it over.
    Regarding the rest of it, there's no copyvio any more that I can detect, no notability problems (WP:NBOOK#1 met a couple times over) and no referencing or neutrality issues. Happy with the hook (accurate, interesting, good length) and QPQ. — Bilorv (talk) 22:22, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
    Oops, that's two mistakes in a row by me. Definitely meant to select the "expanded" option when I created the nomination, and then I let myself get fooled when DYKcheck didn't throw any warnings. Will remedy this shortly! DanCherek (talk) 22:29, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
    @Bilorv: I've added a "Themes" section to the article so I think it's eligible for DYK now! Thanks for the review. DanCherek (talk) 23:55, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
    All good, and problem solved. Happy to approve! — Bilorv (talk) 02:26, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
To T:DYK/P3
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia