Template:Did you know nominations/A Letter to Momo

In today's world, Template:Did you know nominations/A Letter to Momo is a topic that has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. Whether due to its historical relevance, its impact on contemporary society or its influence on popular culture, Template:Did you know nominations/A Letter to Momo is a topic that continues to generate interest and debate. Over the years, Template:Did you know nominations/A Letter to Momo has been the subject of countless research, discussions and analysis, leading to a greater understanding of its complexities and the identification of multiple perspectives on it. In this article, we will explore some key aspects related to Template:Did you know nominations/A Letter to Momo, with the aim of delving into its meaning and scope in different contexts.
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:27, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

A Letter to Momo

Created/expanded by Lionratz (talk). Self nom at 06:04, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

Hook review for original hook
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk)
Hook review for ALT1
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk)


Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism
Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Crisco 1492 (talk) Fine Crisco 1492 (talk)


  • Tense issues: November 2011 isn't here yet, and neither is Golden Week 2011. Please reword the article to show what is expected and what has actually happened. Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:20, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
Should have corrected most issues.--Lionratz (talk) 05:57, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
  • Good to go! AGF on Japanese sources. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:03, 4 October 2011 (UTC)