Talk:Runrunes
In today's world, Talk:Runrunes is a relevant topic and of growing interest to a wide range of people. Whether it is everyday life, politics, technology or any other field, Talk:Runrunes plays a crucial role in the way we live and how our environment evolves. As society advances and circumstances change, it is essential to stay informed and reflect on Talk:Runrunes, both in its current context and its historical relevance. In this article, we will delve into the fascinating world of Talk:Runrunes and explore its various aspects and implications for our daily lives.
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Runrunes article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Political stance
The recently added "Political stance and editorial opinion" is essentially a WP:COATRACK, since it talks about founder Nelson Bocaranda and not about the outlet per se (which has included sources that even predate the Runrunes' creation). WP:SYNTH should also be reminded since it does not mean that Bocaranda's positions are shared by the Runrunes editorial staff. Notifying @Casra:, as they questioned the removal the first time around, so they can share their thoughts. While I'm at it, I'll also share the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Venezuela/Reliable and unreliable sources#Latest changes, where several of these problems are expressed. NoonIcarus (talk) 11:06, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- @WMrapids: Please address the concerns here before reverting again. Be mindful of WP:BRD. --NoonIcarus (talk) 01:36, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Saw your concerns. Still does not take away from sources describing it as "pro-opposition". WMrapids (talk) 01:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- No they don't. Reuters and LatAm Journalism Review by the Knight Center don't make any mention about Runrunes' position, only Bocaranda's. --NoonIcarus (talk) 11:19, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Still no response to the issues over here. --NoonIcarus (talk) 00:24, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Runrunes is Bocaranda's personal website, so the inclusion of his political stance is warranted. WMrapids (talk) 05:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- This is currently being sorted out in a noticeboard, but just for the record: saying that Runrunes is Bocaranda's personal website is your personal opinion, and it is not supported by the sources. You're citing pages that date back to 2012 and that refer to his columns, far from the investigative newspaper that Runrun.es has become after 12 years and include their Victims Monitor. Even in the contrary, you're still using sources that talk about Bocaranda and not the outlet. --NoonIcarus (talk) 12:19, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Runrunes is Bocaranda's personal website, so the inclusion of his political stance is warranted. WMrapids (talk) 05:23, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
- Saw your concerns. Still does not take away from sources describing it as "pro-opposition". WMrapids (talk) 01:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)