Talk:Quantum spin liquid

The contents of the Strongly correlated quantum spin liquid page were merged into Quantum spin liquid on 27 July 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Requested articles This article is within the scope of WikiProject Requested articles, because it is used for the administration of the Requested articles process or it was formerly listed at Requested articles.Requested articlesWikipedia:WikiProject Requested articlesTemplate:WikiProject Requested articlesRequested Science This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Article needs a section on any potential technological applications (if any) for this state of magnetism, if it is proven to exist.

H.Tamahagane 16:50, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Article ALSO needs a section on what this theory, if proven true, will say to us scientifically. What will it tell us (if anything) about magnetism, quantum states, or even the nature of the universe.

H.Tamahagane 16:55, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

MIT has discovered what they believe to be an actual Quantum Spin Liquid, Herbertsmithite: Extreme Tech Article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.106.61.238 (talk) 16:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

I just came here after doing a literature review on frustrated magnets and think we need to be clear about what constitutes a discovery. The earliest detection of lack of long-range order was done with Cs₂CuCl₄ back in 2000 (Coldea et al.). But people in 2012 still didn't have an agreement as to whether the spin liquid has been discovered... My guess is that until physicists could match their experimental findings with a theory that successfully explains it, which happened in 2016 (Banerjee et al.), they were not 100% comfortable calling it a discovery. --D昌양 (Talk) 19:09, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

I've got a degree in biology, but the lead stumps me. A few parenthetical comments to clarify what a permanent magnetic moment is, or even whether these substances are actual fluids would help. μηδείς (talk) 18:21, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Does it look better now? Do you have any additional suggestions for readability? Thanks! SPat ^talk 03:45, 24 December 2012 (UTC)