In today's world, Talk:Paul Westwood is a topic/concept/person that has gained great relevance and interest in various areas of society. Whether in politics, science, art or everyday life, Talk:Paul Westwood has marked a before and after in the way people perceive and approach different aspects of life. Its impact becomes evident in the way conversations develop, in the approach given to certain problems or in the way decisions are made. Talk:Paul Westwood has generated controversy, inspiration, reflection and action, becoming a key element to understand the complexity of today's world. In this article, we will explore the impact of Talk:Paul Westwood and analyze its influence in different areas, as well as its possible implications for the future.
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 March 2019. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Conflict of interest of the mass of material added in 2019 is not the issue so much as the multiple problems within the material itself. Did a bunch here today, but more needed regarding the items covered in the other "to do" templates at the top of the article. Thanks in advance to any editors who jump in with further fixes. Jmg38 (talk) 08:49, 27 September 2021 (UTC)
I removed a section that was posted under "career" which wasn't a fact stated about his work but seemed to be bias and persuasive with wording. It was painting a picture making the reader believe that Mr.Westwood had a dream and had to pursue it without evidence to back the claim. Although yes Westwood did return to London to become a session musician the wording before that claim gave off a tone that seemed to have more than a factual reasoning behind it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kbiallas (talk • contribs) 01:01, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
I removed all of the uncited text per WP:CITE and WP:BLP; the remaining lists appear to be cited by the general references. Do not add further text or return old material without also adding inline citations; if you don't know how to do this, see this page. Baffle☿gab11:15, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
