Talk:National Archives of Trinidad and Tobago

In today's article, we are going to delve into the exciting world of Talk:National Archives of Trinidad and Tobago. Whether you're an expert in the field or just starting to explore it, this article has something for everyone. We will explore the most relevant aspects of Talk:National Archives of Trinidad and Tobago, from its history to its impact on today's society. Additionally, we will discuss the latest trends and discoveries related to Talk:National Archives of Trinidad and Tobago, as well as opinions from experts in the field. Get ready to embark on a fascinating journey through Talk:National Archives of Trinidad and Tobago and discover everything this theme has to offer. Do not miss it!

Untitled

"References: Peters, Edwina. A Chronology of Archival Development in Trinidad and Tobago. Caribbean Archives 10 (1993): 23-32."

I'm worried that there may be copyvio issues here. Google didn't turn up anything. I don't have access to this book through my local library, so I can't proceed further on this. Kathy A. 01:31, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Expert review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.

There was no response. Will send the article to AfD. --B. Wolterding 13:55, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


As part of the Notability wikiproject, I am trying to sort out whether this topic is notable enough to have its own article. This orphaned article is actually based on one source, which I don't have access to, and Google turns up almost nothing (I found one hint that the archive exists, so the article is not a hoax). Could you have a look and tell me whether the article should be kept, or whether it should be removed as non-notable? Or maybe there's a good place to merge it?

Your opinions are welcome; please add your comments below. --B. Wolterding 15:58, 23 July 2007 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Some reworking of the text is required near the end - use of the first person plural etc. Jackiespeel (talk) 17:07, 24 January 2017 (UTC)