In today's article we are going to delve into the fascinating world of Talk:Maurice Bishop International Airport. Since its inception, Talk:Maurice Bishop International Airport has aroused the interest of millions of people around the world. Throughout history, Talk:Maurice Bishop International Airport has been the object of debate, study and admiration, becoming a topic of great relevance in different areas. In this article, we will explore the different aspects of Talk:Maurice Bishop International Airport, from its origin to its impact on today's society. We will discover its importance, its possible applications and the implications it has for the future. Get ready to immerse yourself in this exciting topic and discover everything Talk:Maurice Bishop International Airport has to offer.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Grenada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Grenada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GrenadaWikipedia:WikiProject GrenadaTemplate:WikiProject GrenadaGrenada
This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation
This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked
Coverage and accuracy: not checked
Structure: not checked
Grammar and style: not checked
Supporting materials: not checked
To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call:
I've tried to smooth out some of the loaded terms in this article -- calling the airport an "airfield," for example.
Also, while Cubans were involved in constructing the airport, and they did have weapons, I have seen no evidence that there were regular units of the Cuban military defending the airport (or anywhere on the island). I have glossed this over by using 'cuban forces' in place of 'cuban military forces.'
Also I think the Coard/Austin crowd were not just "pro-" Communists, I think they were doctrinaire Communists. But I will leave that edit to someone more familiar with their politics. Roregan (talk) 18:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
weasel words
weasel words like "hard-line" should be avoided. Hard to document, and if stated _should_ be documented prior to usage.
I question the accuracy of the sentence "Despite resistance from Grenadian armed forces (PRA - People's Revolutionary Army) and armed Cuban construction workers, the Rangers secured all of their objectives on the airfield quickly". There is no evidence that I am aware of any significant resistence. However the capture of the airfield was not quick or easy. The initial landing by Delta Force was a fiasco - they were pinned down by the one machine gun that was apparently available to defend the airport. It was not until some hours later that Rangers arrived to rescue them.203.184.41.226 (talk) 07:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
