Talk:List of centenarians (jurists and practitioners of law)/Archive 1

Today, Talk:List of centenarians (jurists and practitioners of law)/Archive 1 is a topic that arouses interest in a wide variety of people around the world. Whether because of its influence on society, its relevance in history, or its impact on daily life, this topic has captured the attention of academics, experts, and enthusiasts alike. From its origins to its implications in the present, Talk:List of centenarians (jurists and practitioners of law)/Archive 1 continues to be the subject of constant debate and analysis. In this article, we will explore in depth the different aspects of Talk:List of centenarians (jurists and practitioners of law)/Archive 1, from its origins to its evolution over time, in order to provide a comprehensive look at this fascinating topic.
Archive 1

Seems to only be notable for his age, not convinced he qualifies for inclusion in this article. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 08:44, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

I agree, in fact we already discussed (and removed) him once: Talk:Lists of centenarians/Archive 1#Update. Canadian Paul 14:30, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
Okay, I am puzzled: It seems to me being notable for age is what the list of centenarians is about. Do they also have to be notable in their fields? How does one list someone who made it to 107 who is otherwise not notable? (BTW, I think Chittick is notable, but I can discuss that later.) Please get back to me on this soon.--Jrm2007 (talk) 14:40, 29 June 2010 (UTC)
The rough standard we use is, if this person died 50 years ago, but still accomplished everything else they had, would that person still have a Wikipedia page? If the answer is "probably not", then we don't include them. If we included just everyone who was notable for their age, there'd be no difference between this list and all the associated oldest people lists. As with anything though, any individual is subject to consensus, so we've included some and left others just by talk page agreement. Canadian Paul 15:26, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on List of centenarians (jurists and practitioners of law). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:05, 29 December 2017 (UTC)