Talk:Liechtenstein at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1

Talk:Liechtenstein at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1 is a topic that has generated interest and debate in recent years. Known for its relevance in different aspects of society, this topic has captured the attention of experts and people interested in understanding its impact. As you delve deeper into Talk:Liechtenstein at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1, new perspectives and questions arise that invite you to explore its many facets. This article seeks to offer a comprehensive view of Talk:Liechtenstein at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1, addressing everything from its origins to its current implications. Through a detailed analysis and enriching reflections, it is intended to provide the reader with a broader and more enriching look at Talk:Liechtenstein at the 2016 Summer Olympics/GA1.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kees08 (talk · contribs) 19:07, 24 February 2017 (UTC)


Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.

Capitalize Parade of Nations

Men's shouldn't be capitalized

Use a different verb: making a national record

Reword this: with a time of 8:38.19 seconds, being 8 seconds off

I do not think a hyphen is needed here: last-eight by

Reword this: Liechtenstein has however, won 9 medals at the Winter Olympics.

1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

After the intro, wikilink the first time something is mentioned in the main article, such as the athletes names.  Already done

Is that 'see also' link really necessary? I do not see how it is relevant.  Done

2. Verifiable with no original research:
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.

Are the national record times for Hassler accurate? I cannot read German, and the translator makes it look like it is not accurate. --Not sure. I believe I thought I was doing the 2012 Olympics and took it from here.

I also do not see where in the citation it says Meier set the national record, but I may be blind. --Added Liechtensteinian records page as a ref instead of BBC, see bottom of new ref.

2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
2c. it contains no original research.
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.

I think the flag should have this added to the licensing section: {{Insignia}}  Done

6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

Captions that are complete sentences require a period at the end of the sentence.  Done

7. Overall assessment.

You're right, I have edited the article to reflect that. Kees08 (talk) 20:07, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. It's not a big deal, but it's usually literally the first that one notices. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 20:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia