Talk:Kamala Harris/Archive 7
Nowadays, Talk:Kamala Harris/Archive 7 is a widely discussed and debated topic in society. Its relevance has become increasingly evident as the years go by, and its impact has been felt in a variety of areas, from politics to technology, culture and economics. Talk:Kamala Harris/Archive 7 has captured the attention of experts and the general population, generating growing interest in understanding its implications and seeking solutions to the challenges it presents. In this article, we will explore Talk:Kamala Harris/Archive 7 in depth, analyzing its impact, implications, and possible avenues to address this issue effectively.
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Kamala Harris. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 |
Wage theft
A Politico article on her campaign just reported, "... the campaign’s decision to stop paying many senior staff as of Saturday, even those initially told they would be paid through the end of the year."
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/16/kamala-harris-donors-00190020
This was worth mentioning when Trump stiffed people that he owed money to, so it's worth mentioning when Harris did the exact same thing.
The Last Hungry Cat (talk) 02:50, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
- "when Trump stiffed people" Which Trump? The Family of Donald Trump has included several shady businesspeople. Dimadick (talk) 11:37, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Was it, or was it in fact different? Slatersteven (talk) 11:39, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Alleged fraud and alleged insolvency are not the same thing. And notice as well that the campaign is raising money to pay off debts, not filing for bankruptcy protection in order to avoid them. The allegations against Trump if true were criminal. TFD (talk) 14:36, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- KInd of irrelevant as many of his companies did declare bankruptcy, which means they did not pay all their debts. Alo Trumo has been prosecuted for fraud, it's not just an allegation. Slatersteven (talk) 14:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Trump is not the topic of this talk page. Shouldn't "the campaign's decision" belong on the campaign talk page, not this one? – Muboshgu (talk) 15:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Just making the point "its not analogous". Slatersteven (talk) 15:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to point the reply at you directly, Slatersteven. That point is for everyone. Surely there are differences between this and what Trump has been accused of doing. – Muboshgu (talk) 15:24, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Just making the point "its not analogous". Slatersteven (talk) 15:13, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Trump is not the topic of this talk page. Shouldn't "the campaign's decision" belong on the campaign talk page, not this one? – Muboshgu (talk) 15:03, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- KInd of irrelevant as many of his companies did declare bankruptcy, which means they did not pay all their debts. Alo Trumo has been prosecuted for fraud, it's not just an allegation. Slatersteven (talk) 14:41, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- While I do not subscribe to the "fairness doctrine"-esque notion that because something is mentioned in regard to the conduct of one politician it ought be mentioned in another politician's article, wage theft has a specific legal connotation, and until such is adjudicated, it is best to surmise the state of the campaign as having "encountered financial difficulties" rather than "engaged in wage theft". Moreover, the phrasing of theft invokes a particular scienter and moral status for which does not appear justified in application to this concern as of now.Irruptive Creditor (talk) 08:11, 21 November 2024 (UTC)