Talk:Jules Janin

In this article, we will further explore the topic of Talk:Jules Janin, a topic that has captured the attention of academics, professionals, and enthusiasts alike in recent years. Since its emergence, Talk:Jules Janin has aroused great interest in various fields, generating debates and reflections that have contributed significantly to the advancement of knowledge in areas such as science, technology, culture and society in general. Throughout these pages, we will immerse ourselves in the fascinating world of Talk:Jules Janin, analyzing its different facets, its impact and its relevance in the current context. From its origins to its possible future developments, we will embark on a journey of discovery and understanding that will allow us to appreciate the importance and potential of Talk:Jules Janin in the contemporary world.

Neutrality

I think the POV for this article is somewhat biased against him. Read this passage from the article:

From the day, however, when Janin became the theatrical critic of the Débats, though he continued to write books indefatigably, he was to most Frenchmen a dramatic critic and nothing more. He was outrageously inconsistent, and judged things from no general point of view whatsoever, though his judgment was usually good-natured. Few journalists have ever been masters of a more attractive fashion of saying the first thing that came into their heads.

Note the use of words such as outrageously or a more attractive fashion. The article seems to be written against his favor in one sentence, then switches back to another POV.

Use less "commentary" language, and use more formal, neutral language.

Bibliomaniac15 00:42, 9 February 2006 (UTC)

This language probably comes from the 11th edition of the Encyclopædia Britannica of 1911, which is always particularly problematic due to its Victorian aesthetic pronouncements and rabid Francophobia. Although use of the EB on the English wiki has permitted the fast creation of a lot of pages, almost every EB-based article needs to be rewritten for an encyclopedic and neutral style/pov. --NYArtsnWords 15:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)