In this article, we are going to delve into the exciting world of Talk:John Riccitiello. Throughout the pages that follow, we will explore different aspects related to Talk:John Riccitiello, from its origin to its most current applications. Talk:John Riccitiello is a topic that has captured the attention of millions of people around the world, and as we progress in our research, we will discover the reasons behind its fascination. Through interviews, research and testimonies, we will delve into the depth of Talk:John Riccitiello to understand its impact and relevance in today's society. Get ready to discover a new world through the eyes of Talk:John Riccitiello!
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the John Riccitiello article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
"He has also worked to get Unity's game engine into Oculus' software development kit." is entirely inaccurate, and completely nonsensical.
While it appears to be stated in the source, the source is incorrect. Unity is not in Oculus's SDK. Oculus SDK is not in Unity. No permutation of this sentence is remotely accurate.
Didn't there used to be a feature to flag accuracy issues like this? It seems now all I can do is submit a correction (blocked by protected page) or start talk here - which I suppose isn't the worst thing.
That's a good idea, there should be a "Controversy" section added. Maybe merge it with the "litigations" section and find a way to fit in all choice quotes by Riccitiello that received media attention.
Calling developers who focus on creativity rather than monetization "fucking idiots"
Contrast his quotes on Unity monetization with the new Unity runtime fee announcemnt "There's no royalties, no fucking around. It's simple." "I do think you could argue that royalties are quite a bit like free-to-play. They sort of hook you and then try to exploit that relationship. That's not what we're trying to do."
"When you are six hours into playing Battlefield and you run out of ammo in your clip and we ask you for a dollar to reload, you’re really not that price sensitive at that point in time”
Add a section on Consumerist rating EA as the "Worst Company in America" several times in a row under his leadership, maybe something about controversial EA monetization schemes?
I think this should include that he resigned amid the unity pricing controversy. It isn't like he just retired for no reason. Cha5mcha5m (talk) 19:00, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
IMO the controversy should be elaborated in the career on as "amid controversy" feels like it downplays the absolute shitstorm that took place. It's definitely notable to his career and far more notable than some of the aformentioned events. DarmaniLink (talk) 23:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
This Page is Incredibly Incomplete
Nothing about his tenure in any of the positions is in here. He left Unity "amidst controversy" yet we don't get to see what the hell that means on this page. He is one of the most hated figures in gaming as an individual, when he lead EA it was voted the worst company in America as Meeepmep said above, there should be context for readers to understand his impact.
To this day the gaming industry is reacting to the fallout of the pricing changes he tried to enact at Unity. 2600:1700:7F:8580:B147:E14F:EA83:9E64 (talk) 14:17, 20 April 2024 (UTC)