Talk:Holt Manufacturing Company/GA1

In this article we are going to delve into Talk:Holt Manufacturing Company/GA1, a topic that has captured the attention of many people in recent years. Talk:Holt Manufacturing Company/GA1 is a topic that covers a wide range of aspects, from its impact on society to its implications in the business world. Throughout this article, we will look at the different facets of Talk:Holt Manufacturing Company/GA1 and explore how it has evolved over time. Furthermore, we will examine its relevance today and discuss its possible impact in the future. From its origins to its contemporary applications, Talk:Holt Manufacturing Company/GA1 is a topic that continues to generate interest and debate, and we are excited to dive into its study in this article.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: S Masters (talk) 09:34, 12 April 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Minor prose issues which I have fixed, and article complies to MoS.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    All references appear to be in order.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    Requirements in this area have been met.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
    Complies with WP:NPOV.
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
    Article appears to be stable.
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Pictures comply with fair use requirements and captions are all in order.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Summary: There were a few minor prose issues, mainly to do with punctuation. As they were minor, I decided to fix these myself. A lot of work has gone into this article. I am satisfied that this article complies with all the requirements for a Good Article, and I am happy to pass it for GA status. Congratulations to all those involved.