This article was nominated for deletion on 20 January 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was WP:WITHDRAWN.. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
This article was tagged for cleanup but I don't know what cleanup is being requested so I am removing the cleanup tag. RJFJR (talk) 15:05, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
On April 2016 I renovated the article, organized sections and provided appropriate references. It would be good to obtain some image of light microscopy of a bivalent under creative commons license to illustrate the text (annotate centromere, chiasmata, homologs, chromatids etc...).
Is it correct, that bivalents have at least 1 cross over? According to Essential Cell Biology (Alberts et al.), they don't need to have a cross over. Can we have a citation for the defenition? Some of the earliest version from 2013 also stated that bivalents are just 2 chromosomes (4 chromatids) held together by a complex: nothing about any cross over? None of the later citated sources contain any actual definition of bivalents, they just mention them in a context to other subjects? Benj5378 (talk) 16:32, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
In the first paragraph of the "Function" section, a sentence is interrupted and the abstract to a research article about bivalent genes is suddenly inserted. The inserted text is not relevant. 2603:6011:800:3BE6:DC54:379B:6E6D:2DFB (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2025 (UTC)