This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Manila Bay article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on May 1, 2008, May 1, 2009, May 1, 2010, and May 1, 2014. |
This is indeed the Mock Battle of Manila Bay. The downfall of the Spanish Colonizers in the Philippines was in 1898 after the Mock Battle. Wherein the "winning" force will get to colonize the Philippine territory, which in this case, the Americans. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.1.3.194 (talk) 15:21, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
Wasn’t this the “mock battle” they used to tell us about in high school and before that?
Jaudenes ... believed that the Spanish position was hopeless in the face of a superior enemy and in the face of the Filipino rebels. To save face, he insisted that to satisfy the Spanish code of honor, there should be a mock battle, after which the Spanish forces would surrender. He further insisted that the Filipino rebels should not be allowed to participate in the surrender of Manila, that is to say, they should not be allowed to enter the city. Dewey and Merritt accepted the terms even it meant treachery to their ally, General Aguinaldo. Dewey went so far as to promise to hold back the Filipino troops while the mock battle was being enacted. This agreement between Jaudenes, on one hand, and Dewey and Merritt, on the other, was so secret that no one else in either camp knew of its existence.
Uthanc 21:25, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
No, this was not a mock battle. Hundreds of people were killed in it. Gingermint (talk) 03:24, 23 February 2011 (UTC)
The battle you guys are quibbling about is the Battle of Manila (1898), which is a separate battle which took place in August 13, 1898 -- over three months after the battle described in this article. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:17, 24 February 2011 (UTC)
The article states, in an unsourced sentence, that the Spanish were painting their vessels. At 5 am on a Sunday? This seems rather mythological. Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:30, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
I, too have looked around, using the cited and other sources, and have seen nothing about painting. Indeed, there is little saying that the Spanish were even caught unawares. Would recommend deleting that whole sentence, or at least reducing it to something along the lines of: the Spanish forces had been alerted, and most were ready for action. Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 14:40, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Made the change, and also made the paragraph flow in chronological order. Now wondering if the new sentence is needed after all. Piledhigheranddeeper (talk) 15:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
At the beginning of the article it clearly states that 11 Spanish ships were involved in the engagement. However, below it is written that only 8 Spanish vessels were engaged.
Does anyone know the actual number of Spanish warships which participated in this battle? --Az81964444 (talk) 20:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Pretty confusing it must be but thanks for your response.--Az81964444 (talk) 02:23, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Petrel embarked troops captured spanish torpedo boat Barceló and renamed it USS Barcelo (YT-105) at Cavite on may 1st.. Olecrab (talk) 22:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
I just want to add some info re my two recent edits regarding this source. The key para seems to be the one which reads
En cuanto a las bajas, la cuestión no está tan clara como entre los españoles, tras varios partes contradictorios, se reconoció oficialmente un total de 1 muerto y doce heridos, cifras que rechazaron los españoles presentes, que afirmaron que los americanos ocultaban las suyas, y basándose en fuentes neutrales, las estimaron al menos en 13 muertos y 30 heridos. Tal vez Dewey quiso realmente ocultar las bajas a una opinión pública muy recelosa ante la aventura filipina, y para ello las camufló entre los doce muertos por enfermedad de su escuadra en la campaña, o las nada menos que 155 deserciones. Ya sabemos que muchos de sus marineros no eran ciudadanos norteamericanos, y a nadie le importaría demasiado el destino de uno de ellos, especialmente si era asiático, como era corriente entre fogoneros y los puestos más humildes.
which Google Translate renders into English as
As for casualties, the issue is not as clear as among the Spaniards, after several conflicting parties, a total of 1 dead and twelve injured was officially recognized figures who rejected the Spaniards present, who said that Americans hid his, and based on neutral sources, they estimated at least 13 dead and 30 wounded. Perhaps Dewey really wanted to hide the low public opinion very suspicious to the Philippine adventure, and for this purpose the camouflaged among the twelve of his squad killed by disease in the campaign, or no less than 155 desertions. We know that many of its sailors were not US citizens, and no one would care too the fate of one of them, especially if it was Asian, as was common among stokers and the humblest positions.
Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 05:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Ang nangyari SA battle of Manila bay paano binago Ang kasaysayan 49.145.0.82 (talk) 06:01, 1 October 2022 (UTC)