Talk:Ace Combat 3: Electrosphere/GA2

In this article we will explore the phenomenon of Talk:Ace Combat 3: Electrosphere/GA2 and its impact on contemporary society. Since its appearance, Talk:Ace Combat 3: Electrosphere/GA2 has sparked debates, conflicting opinions and has generated deep interest in different areas. Over the years, Talk:Ace Combat 3: Electrosphere/GA2 has evolved and taken on new dimensions, influencing not only the way we interact with the world around us, but also our perception of reality. Through detailed analysis, we will address the various facets of Talk:Ace Combat 3: Electrosphere/GA2 and examine its relevance in the current context.

GA Review

GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 01:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)


This looks solid. ♦ jaguar 01:33, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

Lead
  • " such as destroying a fleet of enemies" - I feel that such as destroying squadrons of enemies works better
    • Fixed. You're right, it does look better.
  • "base for the game's ideas and mechanics" - link game mechanics
    • Done.
Gameplay
  • The screenshot caption could benefit from a little more detail - what are the clockwise elements of the HUD?
    • Specified what the HUD elements are.
Development
  • "Drama shows and the game R4: Ridge Racer Type 4 (1998) served as inspiration for this idea" - by drama shows, do you mean television programmes?
  • "This led to the game's futuristic, science fiction setting and world" - the comma isn't necessary
    • Tossed.
  • "the team's limited skills made them skeptical if their vision and world could properly be implemented" - this would flow better as the team's limited skills made them skeptical of their vision and world being implemented
    • Rewrote.
Release
  • "The company broke the silence in November, opening up an website" - a website
    • That was a typo. Fixed.
  • "Only a single level and a select few aircraft were shown" - repetition of 'show' in previous sentence; revealed may be better
    • Replaced with "revealed".
Reception
  • I noticed that the names of reviewers aren't mentioned in the text. This won't by any means hold a GAN back but the prose will markedly improve if reviewers' comments were linked back to their names rather than publications - something to consider if you take this to FAC
    • I often flip-flop between using reviewer names or just the names of the publications since I don't have a solid opinion or preference on it. I've decided to mention their names in the review as I'm thinking of taking this to FAC sometime soon.
  • "It holds a 74% on the video game review aggregator" - missing word
    • Another typo. Fixed.
  • "Official Czech PlayStation Magazine had a similar response" - missing 'the' before Official
    • Added.
  • "Official UK PlayStation Magazine said that it felt" - missing definite article here too. The publication is also missing a link
    • Added both of those.

This article has improved a lot since its last review. It is well-written, comprehensive and the sources all check out. I've left a few comments regarding the prose for you to consider. Once the above are out of the way this will be good to go. ♦ jaguar 17:33, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia