Nowadays, Pulitzer Prize for Commentary is a topic on everyone's lips. Whether due to its relevance in the social sphere, its impact on the economy or its influence on popular culture, Pulitzer Prize for Commentary has captured the attention of a large number of people around the world. This phenomenon is not surprising, as Pulitzer Prize for Commentary possesses a number of characteristics that make it worthy of study and interest by academics, experts, and enthusiasts alike. In this article, we will explore in depth some of the most prominent facets of Pulitzer Prize for Commentary, analyzing its importance today and its potential impact in the future. Through a rigorous and exhaustive analysis, we will seek to shed light on this highly relevant topic and offer a comprehensive vision that allows readers to better understand its scope and significance.
The Pulitzer Prize for Commentary is an award administered by the Columbia University Graduate School of Journalism "for distinguished commentary, using any available journalistic tool".[1] It is one of the fourteen American Pulitzer Prizes that are annually awarded for Journalism. It has been presented since 1970 (55 years ago) (1970). Finalists have been announced from 1980, ordinarily with two others beside the winner.[1]
Winners and citations
The Commentary Pulitzer has been awarded to one person annually without exception—45 prizes in 44 years 1970–2014. No person has won it twice.[1]
1993:Liz Balmaseda, Miami Herald, "for her commentary from Haiti about deteriorating political and social conditions and her columns about Cuban-Americans in Miami."
2004:Leonard Pitts, Miami Herald, "for his fresh, vibrant columns that spoke, with both passion and compassion, to ordinary people on often divisive issues."
2005:Connie Schultz, Plain Dealer, Cleveland, "for her pungent columns that provided a voice for the underdog and underprivileged."
2011:David Leonhardt, New York Times, "for his graceful penetration of America’s complicated economic questions, from the federal budget deficit to health care reform."
2012:Mary Schmich, Chicago Tribune, "for her wide range of down-to-earth columns that reflect the character and capture the culture of her famed city."
2013:Bret Stephens, Wall Street Journal, "for his incisive columns on American foreign policy and domestic politics, often enlivened by a contrarian twist."
2014:Stephen Henderson, Detroit Free Press, "for his columns on the financial crisis facing his hometown, written with passion and a stirring sense of place, sparing no one in their critique."
2015:Lisa Falkenberg, Houston Chronicle, "for vividly-written, groundbreaking columns about grand jury abuses that led to a wrongful conviction and other egregious problems in the legal and immigration systems."[2]
2016:Farah Stockman, Boston Globe, "for extensively reported columns that probe the legacy of busing in Boston and its effect on education in the city with a clear eye on ongoing racial contradictions."[3]
2017:Peggy Noonan, Wall Street Journal "for rising to the moment with beautifully rendered columns that connected readers to the shared virtues of Americans during one of the nation’s most divisive political campaigns."[4]
2018:John Archibald, Alabama Media Group "for lyrical and courageous commentary that is rooted in Alabama but has a national resonance in scrutinizing corrupt politicians, championing the rights of women and calling out hypocrisy."[5]
2019:Tony Messenger, St. Louis Post Dispatch "for bold columns that exposed the malfeasance and injustice of forcing poor rural Missourians charged with misdemeanor crimes to pay unaffordable fines or be sent to jail."[6]
2020:Nikole Hannah-Jones, The New York Times, "for a sweeping, deeply reported and personal essay for the ground-breaking 1619 Project, which seeks to place the enslavement of Africans at the center of America’s story, prompting public conversation about the nation’s founding and evolution."[1]
2023: Kyle Whitmire, AL.com, "for measured and persuasive columns that document how Alabama's Confederate heritage still colors the present with racism and exclusion, told through tours of its first capital, its mansions and monuments–and through the history that has been omitted."[8]
2024: Vladimir Kara-Murza, "for passionate columns written under great personal risk from his prison cell, warning of the consequences of dissent in Vladimir Putin's Russia and insisting on a democratic future for his country."[9]
References
^ abcde"Commentary". The Pulitzer Prizes (pulitzer.org). Retrieved 2013-12-26.
^"Commentary". The Pulitzer Prizes. Retrieved 20 April 2015.