Full range leadership model

In today's article we are going to delve into the fascinating world of Full range leadership model. Whether you are an expert in the field or are seeking information for the first time, this article is designed to leave you with a deeper understanding of this topic. From its impact on society to its real-world applications, we will explore all the relevant aspects that make Full range leadership model a topic of interest to people of all ages and backgrounds. Get ready to dive into a complete and detailed analysis that will leave you with a broader understanding of Full range leadership model.
Sketch of the three sub-types of leadership styles occurring within the full range of leadership model. Abscissa is the engagement by the leader (from passive to active), ordinate is the effectiveness.

The full range of leadership model (FRLM) is a general leadership theory focusing on the behavior of leaders towards the workforce in different work situations. The FRLM relates transactional and transformational leadership styles with laissez-faire leadership style.[1]

The concepts of three distinct leadership styles — transactional, transformational, and laissez-faire — were introduced in 1991 by Bruce Avolio and Bernard Bass[2][3]

Three leadership styles

As shown in the figure, the three leadership styles can be sorted according to a leader's engagement towards their team. The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire is the most popular way to identify leadership style. The 7th factor correlates with Laissez-faire leadership, while contingent reward and management by exception align with transactional management, and the last 4 describe transformational leaders.

Laissez-faire

Laissez-faire is French for "Let them do (what they want)".[4] This style is the least active way of leading people. This leadership style can be seen as the absence of leadership, and is characterized by an attitude avoiding any responsibility. Decision-making is left to the employees themselves, and no rules are fixed. Laissez-faire is the least effective leadership style, when measured by the impact of the leader's opinion on the team.

Transactional

Main article: Transactional leadership

In transactional leadership, leaders promote compliance by followers through both rewards and punishments. Unlike transformational leaders,[4] those using the transactional approach are not looking to change the future, they aim to keep things the same. Transactional leaders pay attention to followers' work in order to find faults and deviations.

A transactional leader follows the objective exchange of value between an employee's performance and the manager's response to it. The manager communicates clear requirements and goals to the employee and rewards achievements.[5] Some authors define transactional leadership as a "conditional reward" – the definition of the goal is negotiated between the manager and the employee, and in the event of a successful performance by the employee, the reward promised by the manager is granted.[6][7]

Transformational

Main article: Transformational leadership

In contrast to the two above leadership styles, transformational leadership follows a different, more long-term oriented philosophy: Short-term, egotistic goals, are substituted by long-term, higher-ranked values and ideals. This paradigm change usually increases commitment, self-confidence, and employee satisfaction.[8] Podsakoff and colleagues distinguish six dimensions of transformational leadership:[9]

  1. Role model
  2. Future vision
  3. Individual support
  4. Promotion of group goals
  5. Intellectual stimulation
  6. High performance expectation

See also

References

  1. ^ Furtner, Marco; Baldegger, Urs (29 August 2012). "Full Range Leadership". Self-Leadership und Führung (in German). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden: 131–188. doi:10.1007/978-3-8349-3837-4_6. ISBN 978-3-8349-3403-1.
  2. ^ Bass, Bruce J. Avolio & Bernard M. (2002). Developing potential across a full range of leaderships : cases on transactional and transformational leadership. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN 978-0805838947.
  3. ^ Avolio, Bruce J. (2011). Full range leadership development (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, Calif.: SAGE Publications. ISBN 978-1412974752.
  4. ^ a b Felice, Louis. Top 8 Leadership Styles Revealed: Which one are you?. Awesome Life Publishing Company LLC.
  5. ^ Judge, Timothy A.; Piccolo, Ronald F. (2004). "Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity". Journal of Applied Psychology. 89 (5): 755–768. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755. PMID 15506858.
  6. ^ Podsakoff, Philip M.; MacKenzie, Scott B.; Moorman, Robert H.; Fetter, Richard (June 1990). "Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors". The Leadership Quarterly. 1 (2): 107–142. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(90)90009-7.
  7. ^ MacKenzie, S. B.; Podsakoff, P. M.; Rich, G. A. (1 April 2001). "Transformational and Transactional Leadership and Salesperson Performance". Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 29 (2): 115–134. doi:10.1177/03079459994506. S2CID 145306908.
  8. ^ Felfe, Jörg (April 2006). "Validierung einer deutschen Version des "Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire" (MLQ Form 5 x Short) von". Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O. 50 (2): 61–78. doi:10.1026/0932-4089.50.2.61.
  9. ^ Podsakoff, Philip M.; MacKenzie, Scott B.; Bommer, William H. (30 June 1996). "Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors". Journal of Management. 22 (2): 259–298. doi:10.1177/014920639602200204. S2CID 145657591.
Wikious
Boobota
Sagapedia