In this article we will delve into the fascinating world of
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki:Sandbox.js, exploring its many facets and aspects that make it so relevant today. From its origins to its impact on modern society,
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki:Sandbox.js has been the subject of interest and debate throughout history. Through a deep and detailed analysis, we will examine its influence in different areas, as well as its implications at an individual and collective level. We will learn the opinions of experts on the subject and the points of view of those who experience the presence of
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki:Sandbox.js closely in their daily lives. What secret is hidden behind
Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/MediaWiki:Sandbox.js? What is its relevance in the current context? These and other questions will be addressed in this article, which seeks to provide a comprehensive perspective on an issue of great importance in contemporary society.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the discussion was: delete. This requires an interface admin, so I've submitted an edit request. Anyone needing this to be userfied or restored is welcome to ask at WP:IANB; no need to consult me. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:01, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
- MediaWiki:Sandbox.js (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Opening a discussion here because it seems like the most appropriate place -- should this be userfied? It was used for a test in 2010, blanked in 2020, and I guess four years later it's still just kind of sitting around as a blank page. I don't know what the proper protocol is with MediaWiki pages, but are we supposed to just have random blank pages in that namespace? I don't think it should be deleted (despite this being a MfD), for what it's worth, I just think it might not need to be in MW:.jp×g🗯️ 08:36, 6 January 2024 (UTC)
- Soft delete on the premise that nobody cares about this old test. Userfy on request. SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:32, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.