Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:TaipeiQuyiTroupe.jpg

In today's world, Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:TaipeiQuyiTroupe.jpg has become a topic of great relevance and interest to a wide spectrum of people. From scientists and experts in the field, to the general public, Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:TaipeiQuyiTroupe.jpg has captured everyone's attention, generating intense debate and discussion in different areas. With a fascinating history and evolution, Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:TaipeiQuyiTroupe.jpg has influenced various aspects of society, culture and daily life. In this article, we will explore the many facets of Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:TaipeiQuyiTroupe.jpg, analyzing its impact, implications and meaning in the contemporary world.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of a fair use image as a replaceable image. Please do not modify it.

The result was to delete the image.

If any, a free image should be used to illustrate the concept of "Quyi". --Abu badali (talk) 00:02, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

There is a thin line between a stage theatre and quyi. It is best to illustrate the art through a group that is entirely devoted to quyi, instead of plugging an image here from a regular theatrical group that also performs quyi on the side. It's the same logic behind using porsche image on a porsche page. You can use a RUF, which has the same chasis and looks identical. But you don't for the sake of avoiding confusion. It mainly comes down to "how can I be sure the people on stage are really doing Quyi, and not just a screenshot of 2 people out of a full fledge theatrical play". Benjwong 01:45, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
Groups will perform quyi again, and a photo could be taken of the performance. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:06, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.