In today's world,
Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Mary Pride.jpg has captured the attention of millions of people around the world. Its impact covers different areas of society, from politics to popular culture. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the phenomenon of
Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Mary Pride.jpg and analyze its influence on our daily lives. From its origins to its relevance today, we will dive into the most important details surrounding
Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Mary Pride.jpg, and critically examine its role in our society. Through this comprehensive analysis, we hope to provide a more complete and detailed look at
Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Mary Pride.jpg, and its significance in the modern world.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of a fair use image as a replaceable image. Please do not modify it.
The result was to delete the image.
—Angr 13:08, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Person no longer makes public appearances since her legal controversy. I suppose someone could stalk her and catch her at the grocery store, but that actually violates laws where fair use does not. CyberAnth 09:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Given the above, it seems unreasonable to expect that a free image will become available. I think the image should stay. Nick Graves 16:23, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- I see no reliable source that she is actually a recluse. This is not J. D. Salinger we're talking about here. There's no reason to believe that she wouldn't provide a freely licensed photo or allow any sympathetic photographer to take one if she was contacted, so there's no argument that this photo is not replacable. It should be deleted. — coelacan talk — 21:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yea, it's Mary Pride. I have emailed her multiple times and mailed her twice in the past year to get such a photo. The request is never answered. Again, I point everyone to the legal controversy as reason for why this photo is not replacable. CyberAnth 00:29, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- In addition, there is evidence suggesting coelacan's nomination of this image is a bad faith one. He nominated the Mary Pride page for deletion and all of its images while his contribs indicate that he regularly edits pages that have images of living persons that are clear-cut cases for replacability.. Mary Pride is a founder of Quiverfull, a page where coelacan has made troublesome edits, e.g., this, and stated regarding them, "I thought the core of their beliefs was to fuck without ceasing (1 Thessalonians 5:17 ). You know, 'keep your wife's quiver full'", which can in no way be construed as good faith. What this all is really about is about WP:HARASS. CyberAnth 09:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it.