Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Greenday kimmel wiki.jpg

In today's world, Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Greenday kimmel wiki.jpg has become a topic of great relevance and interest to many people. It has become a point of discussion and debate in different areas, whether on a personal, professional or academic level. The impact of Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Greenday kimmel wiki.jpg has been felt in society in a significant way, generating conflicting opinions and triggering research and studies that seek to delve deeper into its implications. Since its inception, Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Greenday kimmel wiki.jpg has captured the attention of millions of people around the world, sparking genuine interest and motivating professionals and experts to address its various facets and dimensions. In this context, it is important to fully explore the role of Wikipedia:Files for deletion/Replaceable fair use/File:Greenday kimmel wiki.jpg today and its influence on daily life, as well as reflect on its projection in the future.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of a fair use image as a replaceable image. Please do not modify it.

The result was to delete the image.

There exists free alternatives on commons. -- malo (tlk) (cntrbtns) 18:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

The uploader makes a good point. The image was on the band's website and is intented to be used. Randomfrenchie 23:52, 8 April 2007 (UTC)


{{Replaceable fair use disputed | As the band is in recording, no free-images can be used to replace this image under Fair Use, and none have. See "Fair Use Rationale" below for more details.}} {{Non-free fair use in|Green Day}}

Source

Fair Use Rationale

  • Depicts the subject matter in question
  • Used only for encyclopedic purposes
  • Low-resoultion image used to demonstrate subject matter
  • No free alternatives
  • Image was placed on band's website intended for use
  • Reproduction of image doesn't detract commercial value

This should be more than enough to keep this image  Scrumshus Talk to me 00:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)