The result was to delete the image.
Please, do not remove the replaceable. Read it to learn how to dispute it. Adding a rationale to the page is not the way to go. --Abu Badali 12:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
"For such articles having a representative image of the subject is extremely important to the reader's being able to consume the article's conten" - It's good to have an image, but the readers won't feel unable to "consume the article's contents" in the lack of an image. This is not an article on Lenna or on the Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima.--Abu Badali 12:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
"Getting a shot from a stray Wikipedian meeting her in the street is extremely unlikely". Wikipedia has a lot o free celebrity images. They are not as easy to obtain as car images, but yet they are possible. --Abu Badali 12:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
"...amateur quality image taken as she cares for her everyday business cannot substitute the professional quality image..." - Yes, it can. The policy doesn't says we have free images only when they are of better quallity the existing unfree ones. --Abu Badali 12:52, 29 November 2006 (UTC)