Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Tycho-supernova-xray.jpg's theme is one that has captured the attention of many over the years. Whether it's his impact on society, his relevance in popular culture, or his importance in history, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Tycho-supernova-xray.jpg has left a significant mark on the world. In this article, we will further explore the meaning and influence of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Tycho-supernova-xray.jpg, as well as its relevance today. From its origins to its current impact, we will discover how Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Tycho-supernova-xray.jpg has shaped and will continue to shape various aspects of our lives. Whether you are familiar with Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Tycho-supernova-xray.jpg or a newcomer to its importance, this article aims to provide a comprehensive and insightful look at the topic.
Image was deleted on Commons because it was a copyright violation, see . This is only a notification, I've already delisted it. Deleted MER-C08:31, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
OK, it was undeleted. Having a look at it, it is rather grainy and has an odd linearity to it (5/10 o'clock positions). Is this a keeper? MER-C07:32, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
Comment I think we need to be careful here: If images from the best X-ray telescopes currently in existence are all going to be judged inappropriate for Featured picture status, we may set an unfortunate trend of actively excluding certain important forms of information. That said, unless we have sources discussing information found in the X-ray image that is not in the replacement image, then this time, I'd support delist and replace. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 20:33, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Can the proposed replacement be cropped from the bottom slightly? There seems to be some yellowing dust-type stuff that I'm not quite sure are stars and stuff in a line at the bottom. SpencerT♦Nominate!01:52, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
Keep I think the Chandra image is technically better, as in it provides better science and detail of the structure of the object. I also agree with Shoemaker's Holiday that this is an image from the best x-ray telescope in current existence. Not all images produced from these are going to be Hubble crisp, specifically when they're very distant, just as distant objects with Hubble look very grainy and bad as well. For scientific astronomic images we should be more forgiving of the technological limitations and rate it on scientific, encyclopedic and educational value more. So from that standpoint the Chandra image provides far more science and detail of the object. — raeky(talk | edits)14:11, 6 June 2009 (UTC)
