Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Old saint pauls 2.jpg

In today's article we are going to delve into the topic of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Old saint pauls 2.jpg, an issue that has generated debate and controversy in recent times. Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Old saint pauls 2.jpg is an issue that affects a wide spectrum of society, from professionals in various areas to ordinary people who face challenges related to this issue in their daily lives. In this article we will explore different perspectives and approaches related to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Old saint pauls 2.jpg, with the aim of shedding light on its implications and offering a comprehensive view of this issue. Regardless of your level of experience or prior knowledge about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Old saint pauls 2.jpg, through this article you will find relevant and valuable information that will allow you to better understand this issue and its possible implications in various areas. Read on to delve into the fascinating and complex world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/Old saint pauls 2.jpg!

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2011 at 05:32:30 (UTC)

HDR image of Old Saint Paul's church, New Zealand
Reason
Very small (0.7 Mpix), lack of detail, weak composition, not best example of HDR. Passed on the limit in 2006, but is much below current standard.
Articles this image appears in
Old St. Paul's, Wellington, New Zealand Historic Places Trust, Tone mapping
Previous nomination/s
Nomination 2006
Nominator
Elekhh (talk)

Delisted --Makeemlighter (talk) 21:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)