In today's world, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Bush Cockroach.jpg has become a topic of interest to a wide variety of people. With the passage of time, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Bush Cockroach.jpg has gained relevance in different areas, whether in the personal, academic, professional, political or cultural sphere. The importance of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Bush Cockroach.jpg is not limited to a single area, but its impact extends to multiple aspects of daily life. In this article, we will explore the different facets of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Bush Cockroach.jpg and its influence on today's society, analyzing both its positive aspects and its challenges. Through a multidisciplinary approach, we seek to deepen the understanding of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/delist/File:Bush Cockroach.jpg and its meaning in the contemporary world.
Delist, though it's pretty much just procedural at this point. No articles = no FP, and an unidentified photo isn't appropriate for articles. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 6.9% of all FPs17:39, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
Delist Can we not have an automated process that removes FP from any image not in an article (for say a month) after photographer and nominator have been notified? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:04, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
It may be worth giving a public chance for the image to be reinstated, and, rarely, there are cases where we feature, say, an image divided into parts (not that usable in articles, but best quality) and the still-pretty-big combined file. But maybe an expedited process, like, a list of proposed delists of that sort, that auto-delist if no-one objects? This'll help catch cases where, to give a couple recent examples, the wrong image of a set gets deleted when an image was moved to the infobox (Les Troyens), the image was replaced, usually by an IP, with a much poorer replacement (several cases), or where a delist-and-replace process would be better (The Currier-and-Ives Assassination of Lincoln, say). It also makes Wikibreaks a bit less dangerous. Adam Cuerden(talk)Has about 6.9% of all FPs19:55, 14 September 2019 (UTC)
