Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shanghai Grand Hyatt Atrium.jpg
In the following article we are going to delve into Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shanghai Grand Hyatt Atrium.jpg, a topic that has been the subject of interest and debate for many years. Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shanghai Grand Hyatt Atrium.jpg is a topic that covers many aspects and has different dimensions that are worth exploring. From its origins to its impact on today's society, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shanghai Grand Hyatt Atrium.jpg has been the subject of study and analysis by experts from various disciplines. In this article we will try to address Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shanghai Grand Hyatt Atrium.jpg from various perspectives, with the aim of offering a broad and complete vision of this very relevant topic. We hope that this analysis contributes to enriching knowledge about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Shanghai Grand Hyatt Atrium.jpg and that it serves as a starting point for future research and reflections.
Bottom-up view of the 32-story atrium in the Shanghai Grand Hyatt inside Jin Mao Building.
An impressive picture showing a titillating piece of architecture. Might needs a bit of color adjustment/cleaning, but I can't do it here at college. - Circeus 18:05, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
Nominate and support. - Circeus 18:05, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
I could go for this one. Support. Perhaps cropping out the glaring lights at the left side. Jonas Olson 18:33, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Support if and only if cropped per Jonas. Neutralitytalk 22:02, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
I've cropped the image. Anyone can see the original version on the image's page. Support cropped version. --brian0918™ 23:15, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
I took the original picture and support the improved version. Lawrence Lavigne 00:14, Apr 15, 2005 (UTC)
Support. I think a square crop would be effective on this one. --jacobolus(t) 22:48, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
oppose. im sure it is magestic and great view but, like almost all pics straight up or down, perspective is lost and i have to imagine how this looks rather than seeing it clearly displayed. Cavebear42 00:06, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Agree with Cavebear42. Enochlau 14:01, 16 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Support. Reminiscent of an Andreas Gursky photograph. You don't have to understand the structure, enjoy the pattern. -- Solipsist 19:06, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
In fact, if I am not mistaken, it looks like Gursky has also photographed this building, but chose a different perspective . -- Solipsist 19:11, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oppose - just doesn't excite or interest me - Adrian Pingstone 08:34, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oppose. Somewhat intruiging in its pattern, but otherwise insipid and uninteresting. - Sango123 23:38, Apr 21, 2005 (UTC)
