Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/September 17 2001 Ground Zero 04.jpg
Today we want to delve into the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/September 17 2001 Ground Zero 04.jpg. Whatever its meaning to each person, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/September 17 2001 Ground Zero 04.jpg is a topic that has captured the attention of millions around the world over the years. From its impact on society to its influence on popular culture, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/September 17 2001 Ground Zero 04.jpg has been a constant point of discussion and a topic of interest for researchers, enthusiasts and the curious alike. Throughout this article, we will explore the various facets of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/September 17 2001 Ground Zero 04.jpg, analyzing its importance in different contexts and its evolution over time. Get ready to embark on a journey of discovery and learning about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/September 17 2001 Ground Zero 04.jpg!
Buildings surrounding the World Trade Center were heavily damaged by the debris and massive force of the falling twin towersEdit 1 by Howcheng: Downsampled to 1324px wide (max width of camera) and sharpened.
I think what Sharkface means is that it's a little blurry, as if it was either originally out of focus or has been upsampled. However, it is a historically important photo, so I Support. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ10:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment. The photo was taken with a Nikon D1H with a resolution of 2,012 × 1,324. This image is 3000x2400 so it has been upsampled (presumably to allow for larger prints) but this has resulted in a softer image at 100% resolution. I agree, it is very poor quality even considering this, but if you downsample it back to the minimum requirements, it is sharp enough. Diliff | (Talk)(Contribs)16:56, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Support. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 10:50, 19 December 2006 (UTC)