In today's world, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Regnbyge.jpg is a topic that generates great interest and impact on society. Since its origin, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Regnbyge.jpg has been the subject of debate, research and development, with multiple perspectives and approaches. Throughout history, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Regnbyge.jpg has played a fundamental role in people's lives, influencing the way they think, act and relate to their environment. In this article, we will explore different aspects of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Regnbyge.jpg, analyzing its implications in various fields, from science and technology to culture and art. Additionally, we will examine how Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Regnbyge.jpg has evolved over time, adapting to social and economic changes.
This image appears in the article Rain. It was apparently created by Malene Thyssen, User:Malene on Commons. I found it to be by far the best image in that article. It is in focus, clear, horizon is straight, etc. The best thing about it is that it shows that the rain in the distance is patchy; on the right of the image it is not raining, and on the left it is. It is heavier in some places then others. Where the photographer is standing it is dry. This is the first time I've nominated an image for FP, so I hope I did it right and didn't do anything wrong by nominating someone else's image.
Oppose Read the rules! there's a link to them at the top of the page that took you to this page -"the picture should be of sufficiently high resolution to allow quality reproductions. While larger images are generally prefered, images should be at least 1000 pixels in resolution in width or height to be supported, unless they are of historical significance or animated" This one is 859 pixels across - Adrian Pingstone18:37, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
That image was promoted in early 2005 when the FP criteria were different (its resolution at full size is, in fact 800x767 px). You could try to contact the uploader/creator of this photo and ask if she has a higher resolution version. --KFP (talk | contribs) 19:23, 27 October 2006 (UTC)