Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Image-Disney Concert Hall by Carol Highsmith edit.jpg
Nowadays, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Image-Disney Concert Hall by Carol Highsmith edit.jpg has become a topic of great interest and debate in different areas. Both in society and in the academic field, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Image-Disney Concert Hall by Carol Highsmith edit.jpg has generated a series of mixed emotions and opinions that have triggered endless discussions and reflections. That is why it is relevant to dedicate time and space to explore and analyze in depth the impact and implications that Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Image-Disney Concert Hall by Carol Highsmith edit.jpg has on our lives. In this article, we will delve into the different aspects related to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Image-Disney Concert Hall by Carol Highsmith edit.jpg, examining its origins, evolution, consequences and possible solutions. Likewise, we will address the various perspectives and positions surrounding Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Image-Disney Concert Hall by Carol Highsmith edit.jpg, in order to expand our understanding of this complex and significant topic.
Comment there are still a few dust specs that need removing just above the right hand side of the building, should be an easy fix. I'd support after those are also fixed. Noodle snacks (talk) 11:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Comment Beautifully composed. The current version is a little overprocessed. Would it be possible to do a new denoising on the original photograph? DurovaCharge!16:50, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
I suspect your assessment of overprocessing would also include this version? I haven't done any work on this image, nor am I aware of a less processed version than the latter. It seems that you have more experience in obtaining such things. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 17:37, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Yes, I was comparing the nominated version to that unedited version. The latter is a little on the noisy side, and it looks to my eye that the edit is slightly more aggressive than ideal. Notice the poster boxes and glass doors--one looks a little in need of denoising, the other so smooth it resembles a render. DurovaCharge!01:32, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
There are probably some other editors here who have more experience than I have with noise reduction on modern digital photography. I can do it, but it takes me a while to execute the right tweaks. If no one else steps forward in a couple of days, tug at my sleeve and I'll give it a try. DurovaCharge!02:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Poor crop and overprocessing. A bit too many compression artifacts. If you have an original, I might reconsider. – LATICS talk 21:00, 10 August 2008 (UTC)
Support Pounds of wow! Much more important than any tiny technical flaws (although by all means fix any that can be fixed). Fg2 (talk) 12:40, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
Comment Per Durova's comments above, here's a less aggressive NR edit (Edit2). If I missed anything let me know and i'll fix and upload over. I am still not supporting though per my original vote. Mfield (talk) 03:41, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
