Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Burnie CBD and Port Panorama.jpg
In this article, we will delve into the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Burnie CBD and Port Panorama.jpg, a topic that has captured the attention of experts and fans alike. Throughout history, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Burnie CBD and Port Panorama.jpg has played a fundamental role in different areas, from science to art, through culture and society. Along these lines, we will explore its origin, evolution and its impact on today's world, as well as the different perspectives and opinions that exist around this topic. Without a doubt, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Burnie CBD and Port Panorama.jpg is a fascinating topic that deserves to be analyzed in detail, and in this article we will delve into different aspects to understand its importance and relevance today.
- Reason
- High Quality and informative for the related articles
- Articles this image appears in
- Burnie, Bass Strait
- Creator
- Noodle snacks
- Support as nominator --Noodle snacks (talk) 11:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose this one, the composition feels unbalanced, kind of missing the bottom of the image. Got a better one? --Janke | Talk 12:51, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose The Earth is round....The too flat horizontal line looks unreal and seems like stretched by Atlas's hands...--Caspian blue 20:11, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Try moving the image back and forth sideways (In a larger zoom). You can see the horizon rise and fall. I think its appropriate for this kind of image. A curve too drastic would decrease the image's quality. SpencerT♦C 22:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- I already did before commenting here.--Caspian blue 22:47, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Try moving the image back and forth sideways (In a larger zoom). You can see the horizon rise and fall. I think its appropriate for this kind of image. A curve too drastic would decrease the image's quality. SpencerT♦C 22:28, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- The earth may be round, but the curvature of the earth is not going to be visible until you get to a significant altitude, never mind sea level. A scene such as this should certainly have a flat horizon for enc value as it would not have appeared curved to the naked eye. We would oppose a curved land horizon for sure, and a sea horizon should be the same. If the image were taken from several tens of thousands feet then a properly visible curve might be acceptable. Mfield (talk) 16:34, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose Decent EV, but poor time of day for photography - the lighting is just too harsh with bright roofs, unappealing skyline and strong shadows. Also there appears to be some posterization in the sky (~1000px from the LHS) --Fir0002 04:10, 13 November 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted MER-C 23:58, 19 November 2008 (UTC)