Nowadays, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Australian wood duck - male.jpg is a topic that has captured the attention of many. Whether for its relevance in today's society or its impact on history, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Australian wood duck - male.jpg has become a point of interest for experts and fans alike. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the impact of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Australian wood duck - male.jpg on different aspects of life, from its influence on popular culture to its relevance in the global economy. Through detailed and exhaustive analysis, we seek to provide a holistic view of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Australian wood duck - male.jpg, offering our readers a deeper and more complete understanding of this phenomenon.
Neutral It's a beautiful picture (and I'd add, as often), but I think it should be sharper at that size. I miss some details and texture on the legs, but maybe I'm asking too much which is why I don't oppose. Blieusong (talk) 11:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
It certainly is a good picture, but featuring 1.6MP photos which are not completely sharp is pretty 2005. Ack Blieusong. --Dschwen14:15, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
Support The important part is sharp. It's arty. I love the composition, the colour, the background diffusion to copy a couple of other support votes above. I love the result of the composition and will strongly oppose any sharpening. Blow it up big and enter it in a an art photo contest, also. --Blechnic (talk) 06:37, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Support I like the sharpness of this picture, not to mention the cuteness of the subject. I think it deserves to be an FP. Elephantissimo (talk) 22:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Oppose DOF makes me feel like I'm supposed to be looking at the grass or just the front part of the body. Other images in the article appear equally good.Greener Cactus (talk) 20:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
