Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Anthidium February 2008-1.jpg
In this article, we will delve into the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Anthidium February 2008-1.jpg. From its origins to its evolution over time, we will explore every facet of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Anthidium February 2008-1.jpg and its impact on society. Through various perspectives and detailed analysis, we will try to shed light on this topic that is so relevant today. Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Anthidium February 2008-1.jpg has been the subject of intense debate and controversy, and it is our goal to provide a comprehensive view that invites reflection and debate. Without a doubt, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Image:Anthidium February 2008-1.jpg is a topic that deserves to be addressed seriously and meticulously, and we are sure that this article will be of great interest to all our readers.
Oppose both Original has poor sharpness (I suspect from a too small aperture) and the wings are quite tatty (reducing enc value unless this is characteristic of the species) and are slightly motion blurred. The alternative has harsh lighting and is oversharpened. Nice enough photos, but not quite FP level IMO --Fir000210:34, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Oppose both sorry but I have to agree with Fir0002, the alternative looks false and the original just lacks the crisp detail needed --Hadseys (talk • contribs) 16:07, 2 February 2008 (UTC)