Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:RAN squirrel helicopter at melb GP 08.jpg
Today I want to talk to you about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:RAN squirrel helicopter at melb GP 08.jpg. This topic is of utmost importance and relevance today, as it has a significant impact on our lives. Throughout this article, we will explore different aspects related to Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:RAN squirrel helicopter at melb GP 08.jpg, from its origin to its impact on society. Additionally, we will look at how Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:RAN squirrel helicopter at melb GP 08.jpg has evolved over time and what implications it has for the future. Without a doubt, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:RAN squirrel helicopter at melb GP 08.jpg is a topic that deserves our attention and reflection, so I invite everyone to continue reading to discover more about this exciting topic.
Comment The angle is slightly unhappy because it leads to one of the rotors overlapping the tail as well as over underexposure of large parts of the underside and sides - the farther landing skid has been reduced to a mere silhouette. This all leads to a snapshotty feel overall imo. Approaching the aerospace industry and military with requests for pictures may yield much better material than this. Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 09:34, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
On the other hand the angle is slightly happy because it makes the object 3D rather than 2D-side-on-portrait. It's also from a top down rather than a overhead angle which elevates it from snapshot level IMO. I'm assuming you mean under exposure right? Still plenty of detail there - I'll run the standard suggestion of getting your monitor calibrated. If you don't believe me bump up the gamma or something in your image editor of choice. --Fir000213:52, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Support Great angle. The farther landing skid is not a problem even if underexposed since you can see perfectly the other one. Franklin.vp 15:28, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
