Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Pitta sordida - Sri Phang Nga.jpg
In today's article we are going to delve into the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Pitta sordida - Sri Phang Nga.jpg. This topic has been the subject of interest and debate throughout history, generating great curiosity and attracting the attention of experts and amateurs alike. Since its inception, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Pitta sordida - Sri Phang Nga.jpg has raised countless questions and theories that have contributed to enriching our knowledge on this topic. In this article, we will explore its origins, its impacts on society, and the latest research and discoveries that have marked a milestone in the understanding of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Pitta sordida - Sri Phang Nga.jpg. So get ready to embark on an exciting journey to discover everything you need to know about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Pitta sordida - Sri Phang Nga.jpg.
Support, another beauty pageant contestant (although I wonder why modern cameras still can't entirely focus on small objects like these). Brandmeistertalk09:59, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Because physics. Going off the exif data and this calculator at f/4 with a 500mm focal length and the subject 6.47m away with JJ's camera there's 2.84cm of depth of field--which is smaller than the bird is. Cowtowner (talk) 10:28, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support. Two second exposure?? A fluke but also a bit of an accident, surely? Completely inappropriate shutter speed/ISO. :) I'm shocked that you didn't get any blur. Even if you used mirror lock up, there must be some sort of vibration (wind, etc) in two seconds...? Ðiliff«»(Talk)10:18, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
My newish tripod is pretty rock solid (gitzo GT-5532LS). I broke the old one. But for this shot I was dealing with a broken (read: wobbling) tripod head. Sharp shots around 1/15th were proving difficult. Since the bird was sitting extremely still for a few seconds at a time I tried a longer exposure with a remote release and live view to avoid mirror slap. A two second shot can have less blur because there is time for vibration to die out. Eventually I'll get a new gimbal, when I can afford it. Since then I've made makeshift repairs. JJ Harrison (talk) 03:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)