Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Magdalene College Dining Hall, Cambridge, UK - Diliff.jpg
In today's world, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Magdalene College Dining Hall, Cambridge, UK - Diliff.jpg has become a topic of great relevance and interest to many people. Whether due to its impact on society, its relevance in history, or its influence on popular culture, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Magdalene College Dining Hall, Cambridge, UK - Diliff.jpg is a topic that does not go unnoticed. Over the years, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Magdalene College Dining Hall, Cambridge, UK - Diliff.jpg has been the subject of numerous studies, debates and analyses, demonstrating its importance in different areas. In this article, we will further explore the importance of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Magdalene College Dining Hall, Cambridge, UK - Diliff.jpg and its impact in various areas, in order to better understand its relevance in today's world.
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2014 at 00:53:21 (UTC)
Original – The dining hall of Magdalene College in Cambridge, England. The hall's tables have been set for a formal lunch.Alt - Lens flares edited out.
Reason
It's an interesting view of the dining hall of Magdalene College, one of the constituent colleges of the University of Cambridge in England. The photo was taken from the very corner of the room, allowing me to get a wide angle view that was able to capture the entire table in the foreground (if you look closely, you can see that you're looking almost directly down on the nearest chair). Detail is good enough that you can practically read what was for lunch on the menu. :-)
Question What are the circles on the nearest painting and directly below it on the wall (between the candle tips)? They look like lens flare to me. I couldn't see them on a couple of other views of the same hall I found on the web, but those photos were quite small, so I'm not completely sure. --99of9 (talk) 03:17, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
You're right, its lens flare. I could probably clone the one on the wall out but the one on the painting would be very difficult. Ðiliff«»(Talk)07:33, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Thanks indeed. Sorry for the delayed response, I've been away (Cathedral Photography Trip II, of which photos will soon follow). Nice work, what tool(s) did you use on the painting? I've always found it difficult to remove lens flares from areas of detail as there a complex combination of contrast, colour and brightness alterations. It's one thing to adjust these, but another to do it seamlessly. Ðiliff«»(Talk)19:47, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
Offhand, hue-saturation, levels, clonestamp, healing brush, and I think maybe dodge/burn. Clonestamp and healing brush are very useful for removing small issues (such as rings around the edges) caused by the main adjustments. Adam Cuerden(talk)00:43, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
