In this article, we will explore in detail the impact of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Basil flowers.jpg on our modern society. Since its appearance, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Basil flowers.jpg has captured the attention of experts and the general public, generating debate, controversy and endless conflicting opinions. We will delve into its history, analyze its relevance in the current context and discuss possible future scenarios. Without a doubt, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Basil flowers.jpg has left a deep mark on our lives, and understanding its influence is crucial to understanding the world around us. Read on to find out everything you need to know about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Holy Basil flowers.jpg.
Support Lighting in this image is much better than the last FPC. I also like having a bit of nature in the background. The very top of the flower is out of focus, but the majority of it is there. JujutacularT · C23:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
Oppose: I find the flash lighting and dark background somewhat "unpleasant". Was there a good reason for doing it this way? Maedin\talk06:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Small aperture was required to get the whole inflorescence into focus. Windy conditions = faster shutter = dark bg. FWIW, it's a lot better than the previously nominated picture which almost passed --Muhammad(talk)07:25, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
I realised the small aperture and would have forgiven that on its own. Thanks for explaining the windy conditions, and I do appreciate that it's much better than the previously nominated image. But I think I'll stick with my oppose for aforementioned reasons. Maedin\talk07:34, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
