Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Bangkok Night Wikimedia Commons.jpg
In today's world, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Bangkok Night Wikimedia Commons.jpg has become a topic of great importance and interest to a wide variety of people. Whether it's health, technology, politics, or any other aspect of everyday life, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Bangkok Night Wikimedia Commons.jpg has proven to be a crucial factor influencing our decisions and our well-being. In order to better understand the importance of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Bangkok Night Wikimedia Commons.jpg, it is essential to analyze its different facets and explore how it affects different areas of our lives. In this article, we will thoroughly explore the importance of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Bangkok Night Wikimedia Commons.jpg and how its influence extends across different aspects of our modern society.
Original - The Rajprasong, Chidlom and Sukhumvit skylines of Bangkok, Thailand at night with Lumphini Park in the center viewed from the Sathorn-Silom CBD.
Reason
Another great cityscape photo from Benh. High quality, aesthetic and of great value to the Bangkok article.
Weak Support Very good quality but as per prev night shots up for nom there are several well lit areas that appear to be detail-less due to over-exposure... Im not too technical so not sure if that's exactly the right reason but I know what I'm trying to say! Most noticable on the centre tall building with the well lit white top - I cannot view much detail on the top of that building due to what I think are blown highlights... Other than a few little examples of this the picture as a whole is very good but I can't give full support as IMO I think this harms the picture... Gazhiley (talk) 13:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
I'm in agreement with you on that point. If it were me, I would have reduced the exposure a little which, as you said, would have minimised the detail lost to blown highights. Still, as it is, I think it's still a great image. Ðiliff«»(Talk)13:56, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Exactly... I knew it was something like that... Yeah still a great picture hence support, just not a full support with those issues... Gazhiley (talk) 15:26, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
