Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:2024 Most Żelazny w Kłodzku (8), powódź.jpg
In Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:2024 Most Żelazny w Kłodzku (8), powódź.jpg's article we will explore a fascinating topic that has captured the interest of people of all ages and backgrounds. Whether you are looking for information about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:2024 Most Żelazny w Kłodzku (8), powódź.jpg or simply want to deepen your knowledge, this article will give you a detailed and comprehensive overview of the topic. From its origin to the latest research and trends, I will take you on a journey through the most important and fascinating aspects of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:2024 Most Żelazny w Kłodzku (8), powódź.jpg. Get ready to immerse yourself in a world of discovery and learning as we explore this exciting topic together.
Comment – Przepraszam, but EV doesn't seem to be there. There's little visual info to explain the context or locale of this weather event. – Sca (talk) 16:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Oppose in favor of This image which is in the article, is FP on Commons, and should be in the infobox IMO. The nom image doesn't convey a sense of scale, the car tire and the street lamps are too small to convey scale, and the buildings are cut up. Bammesk (talk) 03:03, 5 December 2024 (UTC)
Oppose per Bammesk and per Sca: that other image does a much better job of illustrating the scale and impact of this disaster. Nick-D (talk) 04:50, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
Support Alt 1, although given that it's a completely different image I think it would have been better to run a separate nomination for it — Moonreach (talk) 15:26, 9 December 2024 (UTC)