In this article, we will explore the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Denver Lightning.jpg in detail. From its origins to its relevance today, we will delve into every relevant aspect of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Denver Lightning.jpg. We will discover its impact in different areas, as well as the implications it has on today's society. We will learn about the different opinions and approaches about Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Denver Lightning.jpg, and we will analyze its evolution over time. Without a doubt, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Denver Lightning.jpg is a fascinating topic that deserves all our attention and reflection, so we invite you to immerse yourself in this article to discover everything behind Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Denver Lightning.jpg.
support What is your subject? Denver or lightning? I cannot vote unless I know this. The image only appears in the Denver article, so if Denver is the subject I must oppose as Denver is not well depicted. However if this image was used on the lightning article, I would probably support it as lightning is very well depicted. HighInBC16:06, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Support I was very pleased to have discovered this image at the commons. I think that it is well depicted and really just a cool photo in general. Editor19841 (talk) 23:18, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Support. Not a bad representation of a lightning strike, but is it the best Wikipedia has to offer? I'm sure there are better lightning images out there. --Tewy04:32, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak oppose. I like the image, but it neither illustrates Denver or Thunderstorm well. The best thing it illustrates is Lightning but it's not in that article, and there are better lightning pictures there anyway. howcheng {chat}21:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)