In today's world, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Company-Shocked-Gillray.jpeg is a topic that has captured the attention of people of all ages and interests. From technological advances to current affairs, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Company-Shocked-Gillray.jpeg has managed to transcend barriers and generate passionate discussions in different areas. Whether on a personal, academic or professional level, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Company-Shocked-Gillray.jpeg has become a topic of relevance that leaves no one indifferent. For this reason, it is important to analyze in depth the impact that Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Company-Shocked-Gillray.jpeg has on current society and the implications it has for the future. In this article, we will delve into the most relevant aspects of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Company-Shocked-Gillray.jpeg and explore its influence on various aspects of daily life.
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 6 Feb 2015 at 17:14:51 (UTC)
Original – Company Shocked at a Lady Getting up to Ring the Bell (1805). Thomas Wright and R H Evans describe the scene as "A widow and her suitors, who seem to have forgot their manners in the intensity of their admiration."
Comment - Not sure I see the EV in either article... to be quite frank I don't see what the bell pull means in this context either. If there was something discussing this a bit better, I'd support. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 18:14, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Possibly courtship? It's a comment on the social faux pas of gentlemen allowing a lady to stand to summon the servants (via the bell pull), rather than doing it themselves. - SchroCat (talk) 00:07, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
See, that's something that a lot of people won't get without actual textual commentary. Unless there were discussion of this code of etiquette (something I can't see being very common now) in an article, I doubt this would have the EV (encyclopedic value) to pass. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 04:30, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
Comment – Well, the caricatures of the supposed "gentlemen" are funny – maybe that's more the point than the period code of etiquette. Sca (talk) 14:20, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
