Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Baby Posture.jpg

In this article we will delve into the fascinating world of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Baby Posture.jpg, exploring its many facets and aspects that make it so relevant today. From its origins to its impact on modern society, Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Baby Posture.jpg has been the subject of interest and debate throughout history. Through a deep and detailed analysis, we will examine its influence in different areas, as well as its implications at an individual and collective level. We will learn the opinions of experts on the subject and the points of view of those who experience the presence of Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Baby Posture.jpg closely in their daily lives. What secret is hidden behind Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Baby Posture.jpg? What is its relevance in the current context? These and other questions will be addressed in this article, which seeks to provide a comprehensive perspective on an issue of great importance in contemporary society.

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2012 at 14:54:56 (UTC)

Original – In humans, Posture can provide important nonverbal communication.
Reason
good quality and frame
Articles in which this image appears
Posture (psychology)
FP category for this image
psychology
Creator
User:Alborzagros
  • Support as nominator --Alborzagros (talk) 14:54, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Comment Image hasn't been in the article at least 1 week. Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:24, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose Not adding significantly to the article it is in and I'm doubtful there is such a thing as a "baby posture". More like a "cute pose", of which there are endless possibilities. Technically, the picture suffers from being taken with a compact camera in terms of noise and sharpness. There's strong vignetting at the corners. Also, a picture of a child in a private place needs some evidence of permission (see Commons:Photographs of identifiable people). It is a nice picture, but not outstanding. It could be improved a little by cropping in a portrait orientation to eliminate some of the wall and the corner vignetting. Colin°Talk 19:09, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose A beautiful child, like most children are, and a nice posture. Also, probably a very special one for the photographer or the nominator. But it doesn't have any significant encyclopaedic value and image quality is on the poor side. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:49, 17 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Snapshot. Cute, but a snapshot. Clegs (talk) 09:04, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose Don't see the EV. Nothing very unique about this picture... I have 100 just like it of my niece and nephew. Dusty777 (talk) 17:26, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
  • It's a really nice image, and I personally like the vignetting. But people are right, that the encyclopedic value of it is a bit lacking. Please keep taking photos, though! Aaadddaaammm (talk) 18:30, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 21:09, 26 March 2012 (UTC)